Bug#587849: [Evolution] Bug#587849: Handle NSS init errors better

2010-07-02 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On ven., 2010-07-02 at 15:41 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > n Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:27 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > David: would it make sense to try fixing permissions in case they're > > considered wrong by NSS and thus it won't open the db? > > I would be _very_ reluctant to do that kin

Bug#587849: [Evolution] Bug#587849: Handle NSS init errors better

2010-07-02 Thread José Sánchez Moreno
El vie, 02-07-2010 a las 16:27 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez escribió: > On 02/07/2010 16:05, j...@o2w.es wrote: > > > > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:09:47 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez > > wrote: > >> On 02/07/2010 12:27, David Woodhouse wrote: > >>> This code isn't handling errors very well. First it ought to

Bug#587849: [Evolution] Bug#587849: Handle NSS init errors better

2010-07-02 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:27 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > David: would it make sense to try fixing permissions in case they're > considered wrong by NSS and thus it won't open the db? I would be _very_ reluctant to do that kind of thing. I don't want to mess with permissions that someone else

Bug#587849: [Evolution] Bug#587849: Handle NSS init errors better

2010-07-02 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On 02/07/2010 16:05, j...@o2w.es wrote: > > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:09:47 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez > wrote: >> On 02/07/2010 12:27, David Woodhouse wrote: >>> This code isn't handling errors very well. First it ought to report the >>> error more coherently so that we know what went wrong, and then

Bug#587849: [Evolution] Bug#587849: Handle NSS init errors better

2010-07-02 Thread jose
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:09:47 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On 02/07/2010 12:27, David Woodhouse wrote: >> This code isn't handling errors very well. First it ought to report the >> error more coherently so that we know what went wrong, and then it >> should fall back to using the old DBM data

Bug#587849: [Evolution] Bug#587849: Handle NSS init errors better

2010-07-02 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On 02/07/2010 12:27, David Woodhouse wrote: > This code isn't handling errors very well. First it ought to report the > error more coherently so that we know what went wrong, and then it > should fall back to using the old DBM database instead of just failing > completely. > > This should fix thos