On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:12:18PM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Would you happen to know if that option is new or we can safely use
this also for e.g. backports?
I don't know. I need to do some more historical research.
ok.
Would it perhaps be better to always pass this option, also for
sp
tag 587373 - patch
thanks
> Would you happen to know if that option is new or we can safely use this
> also for e.g. backports?
I don't know. I need to do some more historical research.
> Would it perhaps be better to always pass this option, also for specific
> versions of Python?
The prob
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 01:07:15AM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi, as part of the Python 2.6 transition, I've been digging through the
packages that depend on python2.5. An awful lot of them do so because
they install scripts with a shebang of the form:
| #!/usr/bin/python2.5
dh works around
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.87
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi, as part of the Python 2.6 transition, I've been digging through the
packages that depend on python2.5. An awful lot of them do so because
they install scripts with a shebang of the form:
| #!/usr/bin/python2.5
dh works around this by
4 matches
Mail list logo
