tags 586997 + wontfix
thanks
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 03:17:34PM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:27:31PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Ping?
> >
> > Should we close this bug report?
>
> Well the situation is still the same -- at least by looking at the
> build-deps. Wha
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 03:17:34PM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Well the situation is still the same -- at least by looking at the
> build-deps. What would be the reason for closing this bug? A 'wontfix'
> might be appropriate to give us something to argue about, but it looks
> like the bug i
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 12:27:31PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Ping?
>
> Should we close this bug report?
Well the situation is still the same -- at least by looking at the
build-deps. What would be the reason for closing this bug? A 'wontfix'
might be appropriate to give us something to argue
Ping?
Should we close this bug report?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 02:08:00PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is this issue still open in new version libinsighttoolkit3.20?
>
> Kind regards
>
>Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
>
> ___
Hi,
is this issue still open in new version libinsighttoolkit3.20?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 07:46:42AM -0400, Michael Hanke wrote:
> ITK sources contain (among others) a fork/convenience copy of the NIfTI
> libaries, and the package builds it as libitkniftiio and libitkznz. This
> copy is quite outdated in comparsion to the version shipped in the
> libnifti1 D
Package: insighttoolkit
Version: 3.18.0-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
ITK sources contain (among others) a fork/convenience copy of the NIfTI
libaries, and the package builds it as libitkniftiio and libitkznz. This
copy is quite outdated in comparsion to the version shipped in the
libnifti1 Debian packa
7 matches
Mail list logo
