On Thursday 17 June 2010 03:04:02 Jason Woofenden wrote:
> If a backtrace of geeqie with libexiv2-6 0.19-3 would still be useful,
> please let me know how I can get my hands on libexiv2-dbg that is
> compatible with this version. I tried building libexiv2 from source
> (apt-get source libexiv2-6
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 21:24:23 Andreas Huggel wrote:
> This std::list was introduced with the bugfix for the Nikon
> performance problem. It used to be std::vector before. So it looks
> like either the Debian exiv2 0.19-3 package didn't undo all of the
> changes of 0.19-2 (check the typedef for
On 06/16/2010 05:56 AM, Mark Purcell wrote:
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 14:20:34 Jason Woofenden wrote:
Please let me know if I can help further (and how exactly).
Thks Jason,
Could you please install the libexiv2-dbg so we might get a better backtrack
result.
Mark
OK, so libexiv2-dbg isn't
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 14:20:34 Jason Woofenden wrote:
> Please let me know if I can help further (and how exactly).
Thks Jason,
Could you please install the libexiv2-dbg so we might get a better backtrack
result.
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
4 matches
Mail list logo
