Dear Mehdi,
> We prefer targeted fixes ...
> ... we won't be able to review [gs 9.00] or accept it ...
Supposing that those "targeted fixes" may not happen. Would you then
release gs 8.71 with a grave (= RC) bug? Or would you drop gs, or delay
squeeze? I am genuinely curious.
Thanks, Paul
Paul
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:41:39PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 11/27/2010 11:54 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:43:56PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
It looks like the release team won't be accepting the version in
experimental due to the rather large diff.
One way t
On 11/27/2010 11:54 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:43:56PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> It looks like the release team won't be accepting the version in
>> experimental due to the rather large diff.
>
> One way to find out is by asking them.
>
> My plan is to ask
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:54:52 +0100 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:43:56PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> >If I'm reading this discussion right, you expect someone else to apply
> >the attached patches and then assume responsibility for the entire
> >packag
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:43:56PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
If I'm reading this discussion right, you expect someone else to apply
the attached patches and then assume responsibility for the entire
package since you're unwilling maintain it if it has any more patches?
That see
If I'm reading this discussion right, you expect someone else to apply
the attached patches and then assume responsibility for the entire
package since you're unwilling maintain it if it has any more patches?
That seems a bit extreme, but I will take a look at doing so when I
find some time. It l
I wonder if this is now fixed upstream:
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691350#c19
Cheers, Paul
Paul Szabo p...@maths.usyd.edu.au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of SydneyAustralia
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bug
The attached patches are taken from the upstream repository. r11352 has
been backported to GPL ghostscript 8.71. The other patch file contains
the documentation update done by upstream.
Greetings
Markus Steinborn
GNU gv maintainer
diff -u trunk/gs/man/gs.1 trunk/gs/man/gs.1
--- trunk/gs/man/g
Package: ghostscript
Version: 8.62.dfsg.1-3.2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
This is a different issue than ghostscript defaulting -P and not -P-,
for which I'll file an other bug report.
Ghostscript does not honor -P- for postscript system libraries.
As gs_init.ps is such an file that is also r
9 matches
Mail list logo
