On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:49:04 +0100
Simon Paillard wrote:
> It sounds the issue was actually a font issue.
> Here is he pdf built with otf-ipafont-gothic as extra build-dep:
> http://people.debian.org/~spaillard/refcard-ja-a4.pdf.gz
>
> Could you please check it looks ok ?
Thanks! It looks good
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:49:04 +0100
Simon Paillard wrote:
> It sounds the issue was actually a font issue.
> Here is he pdf built with otf-ipafont-gothic as extra build-dep:
> http://people.debian.org/~spaillard/refcard-ja-a4.pdf.gz
> Could you please check it looks ok ?
seems OK :-)
--
victory
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 09:39:54PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> >> >else \
> >> >xmlroff --backend cairo -o refcard-ja-a4.s.pdf
> >> > refcard-ja-a4.fo; \
> >> >fi; \
> >
> >Using cairo backend, japanese refcard can be built (while it failed by
> >the past, see #492597
Hi,
>> >else \
>> >xmlroff --backend cairo -o refcard-ja-a4.s.pdf
>> > refcard-ja-a4.fo; \
>> >fi; \
>
>Using cairo backend, japanese refcard can be built (while it failed by
>the past, see #492597), but I cannot get correct correct letters in the
>generated PDF (while
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:49:54PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2010-09-19 20:58, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > Could you please send the list of the packages you have in your sid
> > system ? It hope it will help
>
> I built using a clean chroot with only the build deps.
> Did ja not compile
On 2010-09-19 20:58, Simon Paillard wrote:
> Could you please send the list of the packages you have in your sid
> system ? It hope it will help
I built using a clean chroot with only the build deps.
Did ja not compile or does it just look bad?
> Given the current amount of fuzzy strings (I will
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:55:01PM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:52:14PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > On 2010-09-19 17:44, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:19:04PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > > > On 2010-09-18 23:04, Simon Paillard wr
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:52:14PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2010-09-19 17:44, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:19:04PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > > On 2010-09-18 23:04, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > > I still wonder which were your build conditions that allowe
On 2010-09-19 17:44, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:19:04PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > On 2010-09-18 23:04, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > > I still wonder which were your build conditions that allowed you to
> > > * successfully * build the package.
> >
> > Interesting: Re
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 05:19:04PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2010-09-18 23:04, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > I still wonder which were your build conditions that allowed you to
> > * successfully * build the package.
>
> Interesting: Refcard builds fine on my system (sid). Building in
> a c
Quoting "Simon Paillard" :
Wolfgang, how did you succeed in building the japanese PDF ?
I didn't do any work on the refcard since a long time.
I'll try to take a look these days.
Real life keeps me busy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
tag 584350 help
thanks
Hi,
Wolfgang, how did you succeed in building the japanese PDF ?
xmlroff version did not change in sid since your upload.
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:10:10PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: refcard
> Version: 5.0.5-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: squeeze sid
> User: de
Source: refcard
Version: 5.0.5-3
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100602 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> XSLT stylesheets DocBook -
13 matches
Mail list logo
