Bug#584264: should not write fcc if sendmail exits non-zero

2010-06-15 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2010-06-13 20:16:31, schrieb martin f krafft: > also sprach Michelle Konzack > [2010.06.04.2358 +0200]: > > This was already discused and an earlier bugreport closed... > > Do you have a reference? Now yes! It is Bug #264973 and was from 2004 Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Mich

Bug#584264: should not write fcc if sendmail exits non-zero

2010-06-13 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michelle Konzack [2010.06.04.2358 +0200]: > This was already discused and an earlier bugreport closed... Do you have a reference? -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "you don't sew with a fork, so I see no reason to eat with knitting needles."

Bug#584264: should not write fcc if sendmail exits non-zero

2010-06-04 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Martin, Am 2010-06-02 20:56:00, schrieb martin f krafft: > mutt writes a message to fcc even if $sendmail exits non-zero. > I don't think it should do that as it might yield the false > impression that a message was sent (e.g. if it was fcc'd to =sent, > albeit not actually being sent). Thi

Bug#584264: should not write fcc if sendmail exits non-zero

2010-06-02 Thread martin f krafft
Package: mutt Version: 1.5.20-8 Severity: normal mutt writes a message to fcc even if $sendmail exits non-zero. I don't think it should do that as it might yield the false impression that a message was sent (e.g. if it was fcc'd to =sent, albeit not actually being sent). -- .''`. martin f. kr