Bug#583371: 583371 + nut_2.4.3-1.1_amd64.deb = 354429

2010-10-16 Thread debian
to the 2.4.3-1.1 are not contributing factors? In other words, had I reverted rather than upgraded in order to resolve bug 583371, would bug 354429 still be an issue? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Bug#583371: nut: diff for NMU version 2.4.3-1.1

2010-10-16 Thread debian
Installed only this: http://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred/nut_2.4.3-1.1_amd64.deb Problem solved. Thank you. On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:00 +0100, "Tim Retout" wrote: > > I see a list of .deb packages at the URL mentioned on Message 15. > > > > Is it advised to wget these & dpkg -i them, or will ap

Bug#583371: nut: diff for NMU version 2.4.3-1.1

2010-10-16 Thread Tim Retout
> I see a list of .deb packages at the URL mentioned on Message 15. > > Is it advised to wget these & dpkg -i them, or will aptitude upgrade be > able to handle it in the next few days? Those ones were Ubuntu packages. You can download the packages that were built for Debian from http://ftp-mast

Bug#583371: nut: diff for NMU version 2.4.3-1.1

2010-10-15 Thread debian
I just encountered this issue on a freshly install squeeze, using a CyberPower 625HG USB-connected UPS. Glad to see the code has been repaired, however I'm not clear as to the steps required to implement the fix locally. I see a list of .deb packages at the URL mentioned on Message 15. Is it adv

Bug#583371: nut: diff for NMU version 2.4.3-1.1

2010-10-15 Thread diocles
tags 583371 + patch tags 583371 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for nut (versioned as 2.4.3-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2, as suggested by section 5.11.1 of the Developer's Reference. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. This applies the same patch

Bug#583371: nut: usbhid-ups failing to communicate with UPS (libusb_get_report: error sending control message)

2010-10-15 Thread Teodor MICU
Hi Arnaud, Since the patch is only a 2 line diff [1], can you upload a targeted fix with this patch for squeeze? I strongly believe that release team will not object to this small fix which is also included in the upstream source. Also, this bug is currently RC. Thanks [1] http://boxster.ghz.cc

Bug#583371: (no subject)

2010-06-04 Thread Joerg Gutowski
The Ubuntu-Version from https://launchpad.net/~zulcss/+archive/server-lucid-bug-fixes fixed the Problem for me. I think the patch should be included in debian as well. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas

Bug#583371:

2010-05-31 Thread June Tate-Gans
It should be noted that I'm not sure of the minor revision of the previous nut package I had installed, but I know it was definitely from the 2.4 branch of the nut tree as it did not require the use of the /etc/default/nut file to operate (though a bug was present in this older version that had an

Bug#583371: nut: usbhid-ups failing to communicate with UPS (libusb_get_report: error sending control message)

2010-05-27 Thread June Tate-Gans
Package: nut Version: 2.4.3-1 Severity: grave Tags: squeeze sid Justification: renders package unusable This problem seems identical to the issue previously reported in Ubuntu's BTS at . Here's the shell transcript from my system, twix: