Bug#583205: mpfr 3.0 needs to be packaged from a separate source

2010-06-03 Thread Laurent Fousse
* Matthias Klose [Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:16:51PM +0200]: > On 02.06.2010 09:56, Laurent Fousse wrote: >> * Matthias Klose [Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 02:05:25AM +0200]: >>> just wondering, why a new -dev package is needed? >> >> It seemed like a good idea at the time, but now that you mention it, >> it'

Bug#583205: mpfr 3.0 needs to be packaged from a separate source

2010-06-02 Thread Matthias Klose
On 02.06.2010 09:56, Laurent Fousse wrote: * Matthias Klose [Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 02:05:25AM +0200]: just wondering, why a new -dev package is needed? It seemed like a good idea at the time, but now that you mention it, it's probably better to have the same name to ease upgrade. I'll upload th

Bug#583205: mpfr 3.0 needs to be packaged from a separate source

2010-06-02 Thread Laurent Fousse
* Matthias Klose [Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 02:05:25AM +0200]: > just wondering, why a new -dev package is needed? It seemed like a good idea at the time, but now that you mention it, it's probably better to have the same name to ease upgrade. I'll upload the change soon. Laurent. -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Bug#583205: mpfr 3.0 needs to be packaged from a separate source

2010-06-01 Thread Matthias Klose
On 31.05.2010 15:19, Laurent Fousse wrote: Hello, * Matthias Klose [Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:45:05PM +0200]: mpfr-3.0 needs to be packaged from a different source package, such that the old library binary stays available while gcc-x.y isn't rebuilt. see http://bugs.debian.org/546161 for the simi

Bug#583205: mpfr 3.0 needs to be packaged from a separate source

2010-05-26 Thread Laurent Fousse
Hello, * Matthias Klose [Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:45:05PM +0200]: > mpfr-3.0 needs to be packaged from a different source package, such that > the old library binary stays available while gcc-x.y isn't rebuilt. see > http://bugs.debian.org/546161 for the similiar issue with mpclib. Thank you fo

Bug#583205: mpfr 3.0 needs to be packaged from a separate source

2010-05-26 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: mpfr Severity: important mpfr-3.0 needs to be packaged from a different source package, such that the old library binary stays available while gcc-x.y isn't rebuilt. see http://bugs.debian.org/546161 for the similiar issue with mpclib. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-r