severity 582275 normal
thanks
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 07:25:18AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> On Jun 18, 2010, at 7:09 AM, Theodore Tso wrote:
> >
> > It could be an e2fsck bug, or it could be a hardware issue. In my
> > experience, every time
> > I've tried digging into problems with e2fsck
On Jun 18, 2010, at 7:09 AM, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> It could be an e2fsck bug, or it could be a hardware issue. In my
> experience, every time
> I've tried digging into problems with e2fsck -fy not fixing all problems in a
> single
> pass, it's been a hardware problem. That being said, multi
On Jun 18, 2010, at 3:12 AM, Buehl, Reiner wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> I tried for a while with alternate hardware and the original controller but
> the error did never happen again. I think your idea of a bug in e2fsck's
> handling of multiply claimed blocks is the only explanation: Maybe during a
Hi Jan,
I tried for a while with alternate hardware and the original controller but the
error did never happen again. I think your idea of a bug in e2fsck's handling
of multiply claimed blocks is the only explanation: Maybe during a corruption
long ago a number of multiply claimed blocks existe
Hi,
On Sat 29-05-10 13:48:56, Buehl, Reiner wrote:
> I have an unused PATA controller on the mainboard - unfortunately I do
> not have two SATA-to-PATA converters. Do you think that connecting the
> two disks to the PATA controller is a good option? If so, I would have to
> buy to adapters.
I
Hi,
I have an unused PATA controller on the mainboard - unfortunately I do not have
two SATA-to-PATA converters. Do you think that connecting the two disks to the
PATA controller is a good option? If so, I would have to buy to adapters.
Is there a way to fix the current file system problem with
6 matches
Mail list logo
