Franz Schrober wrote:
> This is x86 only, right? Mupen64plus is currently only available on
> amd64 and i386, but one of the next version will have support for
> arm.
Yes. Also, I'm not sure what the best disassembler libraries are.
What I should have said is that based on experience with libbfd
Franz Schrober wrote:
>> Which library?
>
> Actually it is a plugin (which is implemented as library). The
> mupen64plus debugger backend. It uses bfd and opcode to disassemble
> the recompiled code.
Thanks. I think a good long-term solution is [1], but in the
short term I would be happy to revi
> [1] http://bastard.sourceforge.net/libdisasm.html
This is x86 only, right? Mupen64plus is currently only available on amd64 and
i386, but one of the next version will have support for arm.
Could it be that this thing is also 32-bit only? The name of the files suggest
it
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
> Which library?
Actually it is a plugin (which is implemented as library). The mupen64plus
debugger backend. It uses bfd and opcode to disassemble the recompiled code.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
Hi Franz,
Schrober wrote:
> What is the state of this bug? I want to package a library using bfd and
> opcodes, but it is not allowed to link against the so files.
Which library?
Curious,
Jonathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
5 matches
Mail list logo