On Fri, September 3, 2010 11:28, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I made a much much smaller patch for the package. Could you please have
> a look at the interdiff, and let me know what you think before I upload?
> Also, should I put myself in the Uploaders: list rather than doing it as
> an NMU? Let me kno
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tue, August 31, 2010 23:28, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Because of upstream insisting to support
>> ante-diluvian version of php, and my will to have
>> the patch upstreamed.
>
> preg_match has been available since PHP 3.0, relased 1998.
>
>
> cheers,
> Thijs
Hi,
I mad
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tue, August 31, 2010 23:28, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Because of upstream insisting to support
>> ante-diluvian version of php, and my will to have
>> the patch upstreamed.
>
> preg_match has been available since PHP 3.0, relased 1998.
>
>
> cheers,
> Thijs
Thanks for
On Tue, August 31, 2010 23:28, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Because of upstream insisting to support
> ante-diluvian version of php, and my will to have
> the patch upstreamed.
preg_match has been available since PHP 3.0, relased 1998.
cheers,
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-req
- Original message -
> You're using "prereg_match" which I think is a misspelling of the
> "preg_match" function. Did you test it?
Wooops!!! :(
> I was wondering apart from this why you keep the ereg(i) calls. All
> versions of PHP also support preg_match, so you can just replace them
>
On Tue, August 31, 2010 20:16, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> Two questions:
>>
>> 1) Why is it needed to pass the object by reference? It looks like it
>> could
>> just as well be passed by value.
>>
>> 2) Why is this bug of grave severity? As I understand it, using this
>> only
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Why is it needed to pass the object by reference? It looks like it could
> just as well be passed by value.
>
> 2) Why is this bug of grave severity? As I understand it, using this only
> generates notices of level E_DEPRECATED. The code functions
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On woansdei 5 Maaie 2010, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Replying to myself, as I didn't know it would go back to the list! :)
>>
>> My patch fixes the eregi calls, but not this one:
>>
>> $err = &new XML_Parser_Error($msg, $ecode);
>> return parent::rais
Hi,
On woansdei 5 Maaie 2010, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Replying to myself, as I didn't know it would go back to the list! :)
>
> My patch fixes the eregi calls, but not this one:
>
> $err = &new XML_Parser_Error($msg, $ecode);
> return parent::raiseError($err);
>
> What's the way
Replying to myself, as I didn't know it would go back to the list! :)
My patch fixes the eregi calls, but not this one:
$err = &new XML_Parser_Error($msg, $ecode);
return parent::raiseError($err);
What's the way to fix for php 5.3.x?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Subject: php-xml-parser uses deprecated eregi and reference of new object
Package: php-xml-parser
Version: 1.3.0-1
Severity: important
Hi,
As per subject and:
http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=16567
I have written a small patch for replacing the eregi calls, and as the
author didn't want to b
11 matches
Mail list logo
