Bug#577725: python3-docutils

2011-05-29 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jakub Wilk [2011.05.29.2332 +0200]: > * martin f krafft , 2011-05-29, 09:17: > >>docutils-doc: > >>- ships documentation > >>- recommends "python-docutils | python3-docutils" > > > >Why the recommendation? > > Now that I think of it, recommendation is an overkill. Would > Suggest be O

Bug#577725: python3-docutils

2011-05-29 Thread Jakub Wilk
* martin f krafft , 2011-05-29, 09:17: docutils-doc: - ships documentation - recommends "python-docutils | python3-docutils" Why the recommendation? Now that I think of it, recommendation is an overkill. Would Suggest be OK with you? - "python-docutils | python3-docutils" is a bit cumberso

Bug#577725: python3-docutils

2011-05-29 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jakub Wilk [2011.05.28.2013 +0200]: > docutils-doc: > - ships documentation > - recommends "python-docutils | python3-docutils" Why the recommendation? > Dear co-maintainers, what do you think? Does it sound sensible? Yes, it does. Thanks! > - "python-docutils | python3-docutils" i

Bug#577725: python3-docutils

2011-05-28 Thread Jakub Wilk
unblock 577725 with 573560 thanks It doesn't look like python-support is going to support Python 3.X, but we can use dh_python3 instead. In order to add support for Python 3.X, I'm going to split python-docutils to the following 4 packages: python-docutils: - ships Python 2.X modules - prov

Bug#577725: python3-docutils

2010-04-13 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: python-docutils Version: 0.6-3 Severity: wishlist docutils upsteam supports Python 3.X, so it would be nice if Debian package shipped modules for this version. -- Jakub Wilk signature.asc Description: Digital signature