Bug#577488: binutils-multiarch: missing diversion for /usr/bin/ld.bfd

2010-04-20 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Matthias Klose wrote: > not sure why c++filt needs to be diverted. It shouldn’t be. $ ldd /usr/bin/c++filt | grep bfd libbfd-2.20.51-multiarch.20100415.so => /usr/lib/libbfd-2.20.51-multiarch.20100415.so (0xb74b6000) $ readelf --dyn-syms /usr/bin/c++filt | grep bfd_ 5:

Bug#577488: binutils-multiarch: missing diversion for /usr/bin/ld.bfd

2010-04-18 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Matthias, Here are the updated binutils-multiarch patches. The patches are based on binutils 2.20.51.20100415-1. I hope it is not too late for them to be useful. Matthias Klose wrote: > I added this for shlibs file generation in the meantime. please use > the DEB_VERSION var. Also the this_

Bug#577488: binutils-multiarch: missing diversion for /usr/bin/ld.bfd

2010-04-15 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Matthias Klose wrote: > On 12.04.2010 05:48, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Unfortunately, patch 1 adds the current version number to some of the >> maintainer scripts; keeping that up to date is a maintainance burden I >> do not want to impose. So patch 2 teaches debian/rules to take care >> of that.

Bug#577488: binutils-multiarch: missing diversion for /usr/bin/ld.bfd

2010-04-15 Thread Matthias Klose
On 12.04.2010 05:48, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Package: binutils-multiarch Version: 2.20.51.20100405-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package uninstallable Tags: patch I just found time to test the new binutils-multiarch with elfedit diversion --- sorry for the delay. Unfortunately, instal

Bug#577488: binutils-multiarch: missing diversion for /usr/bin/ld.bfd

2010-04-11 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Package: binutils-multiarch Version: 2.20.51.20100405-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package uninstallable Tags: patch I just found time to test the new binutils-multiarch with elfedit diversion --- sorry for the delay. Unfortunately, installation still errors out: dpkg: error processi