On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:26:16AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Ah,... and what speaks against putting the wtmp/btmp rules in an own
> file?
Because no other package handles them. They're also in the default
upstream configuration file.
--
Paul Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Ah,... and what speaks against putting the wtmp/btmp rules in an own
file?
Cheers,
Chris.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 13:05 +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
> If utmp/wtmp are present and are being rotated, their replacements
> should have the correct ownership and permissions. If they are not
> present, then they will neither be created nor rotated.
Anyway, but then it should be enough to use just
Package: logrotate
Version: 3.7.8-5
Severity: wishlist
Hi.
Perhaps the handling of wtmp/btmp rotation can be improved a little bit:
1) Since base-files 5.1 (IIRC) the two files are created by default like this:
>chown root:utmp /var/log/wtmp /var/log/btmp /var/log/lastlog
>chmod 664 /var/log/wtm
4 matches
Mail list logo
