>> > Why not use a RC severity then? (not intending to push people, just
>> > to make it clear when checking the bugs list).
>> IIRC, the d-d-a mail asked to use normal severity. But maybe in this
>> case it is better to use RC severity now. The release team can still
>> adjust it as necessary.
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:48:58PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Sunday 28 March 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Why not use a RC severity then? (not intending to push people, just
> > to make it clear when checking the bugs list).
> IIRC, the d-d-a mail asked to use normal severity. But may
affects 575733 -release.debian.org
reassign 575733 release.debian.org,ftp.debian.org
severity 575733 serious
thanks
On Sunday 28 March 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Why not use a RC severity then? (not intending to push people, just
> to make it clear when checking the bugs list).
IIRC, the d-
On 28 March 2010 14:31, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
>
> AFAICS security-master's dak needs to be updated to support source format
> 3.0. This must happen before squeeze's release, therefore I file this bug
> for tracking purposes.
>
Why not use a RC severi
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
AFAICS security-master's dak needs to be updated to support source format
3.0. This must happen before squeeze's release, therefore I file this bug
for tracking purposes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
5 matches
Mail list logo
