Bug#575626: ready package

2010-03-28 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 02:12:37PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > I'll check it, but since you did all the work, if I find nothing to complain > > about, how about you prepare a -1 version with your name on it, and I'll > > just > > upload it? > > I'm not sure that's a good idea since I already

Bug#575626: ready package

2010-03-28 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 01:18:57PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote: > > -- so all you'd need to do is checking if all is ok, bumping the version to > > -1, slapping your name on it and uploading! > > I'll check it, but since you did all the work, if I find nothing to complain > about, how about you prep

Bug#575626: ready package

2010-03-28 Thread Guus Sliepen
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 08:40:03PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > As a member of Crawl's devteam, I prepared packaging of 0.6. Since 1. the > build system has been rewritten from scratch by Steven Noonan, and 2. the > tiles part of Crawl was not present in previous packages, the packaging I'm > se

Bug#575626: ready package

2010-03-27 Thread Adam Borowski
Hi! As a member of Crawl's devteam, I prepared packaging of 0.6. Since 1. the build system has been rewritten from scratch by Steven Noonan, and 2. the tiles part of Crawl was not present in previous packages, the packaging I'm sending you is basically a complete rewrite. There are three binary