This bug appears to be a duplicate of upstream bug
https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?15702
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
package ghdl
severity 574597 normal
thanks
This bug is annoying, and should be fixed, but I'm downgrading it's
severity. This only happens with certain bad code, and does not make the
package unsuitable (serious) for release or have a major effect on the
usability of the package (important) whe
Hi
If I understand well, with vhdl 93 (but not with vhdl 87), it is allowed to have
generics that are not associated. But I think that it is good that there is at
least a warning because a generic can be unwillingly forgotten to be associated
and this will help to find such a mistake.
So the follo
Package: ghdl
Version: 0.29+gcc4.3.4+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi
I noticed that ghdl check for uninitialized generics that are defined
in the top level only.
In this example there is an uninitialized generic which is defined in
the top level :
j
4 matches
Mail list logo