Marcus Bauer wrote:
> Anyway, I would be interested in the rationale of why the protocol is
> bad apart from the fact that Eric is an uber-coder who wants me to use
> his tangle-fangled lib. At least the success of TCP/IP and HTTP tells me
> that protocols are a fantastic thing.
http://gpsd.berli
> It was announced that these changes will happen on the way to 3.0
> early enough. All 2.9X releases prepare 3.0, that is what the
> announcement mail says.
It is not about what Eric Raymond says, it is about what best practice
is in the open source world. And this is not. And I maintain that it
Marcus Bauer wrote:
> Package: gpsd
> Version: 2.92-1
> Severity: important
>
> The version 2.92 of gpsd breaks the API / protocol. Moreover the
> protocol change has not been announced on the gpsd announce mailing
> list and should only happen with a bump of the major version.
It was announced t
Package: gpsd
Version: 2.92-1
Severity: important
The version 2.92 of gpsd breaks the API / protocol. Moreover the
protocol change has not been announced on the gpsd announce mailing
list and should only happen with a bump of the major version.
The protocol has been around for years and tangoGPS
4 matches
Mail list logo
