On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:38:26 +0100
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Don't worry about the timing, I felt free to ping you because I got the
> impression that the adoption did not happen yet simply because there
> were some kind of "after you, after you" impasse in actually doing
> that. I'm not intere
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:19:59PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I'm still intrested in it, as it is a dependency of udav. However I'm
> sorry, I did not had that time in last months for learning first how
> to work around with packaging in the debian-science Team (git repos),
> and I did no
Hi all
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 02:33:52PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:25:47PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > I want to get rid of octave3.0 for Squeeze. The attached patch should
> > suffice. However, given that you are currently building mathgl.oct, but
> > not *
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:25:47PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> I want to get rid of octave3.0 for Squeeze. The attached patch should
> suffice. However, given that you are currently building mathgl.oct, but
> not *shipping* it in any .deb package, you might as well just drop
> octave3.0-headers fr
Package: mathgl
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
I want to get rid of octave3.0 for Squeeze. The attached patch should
suffice. However, given that you are currently building mathgl.oct, but
not *shipping* it in any .deb package, you might as well just drop
octave3.0-headers from debian/control.
5 matches
Mail list logo
