Bug#516670: Bug#573908: klibc packaging

2010-03-15 Thread maximilian attems
tags 573908 pending stop On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > Well, it doesn't look as good as I hoped it would but it seems to > (almost) generate the same binaries now. I did two more or less > unrelated changes, though: switch to Source Format 3.0 (quilt), and > symlink the /ush/sha

Bug#573908: klibc packaging

2010-03-15 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06:07:25AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:55:15PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > > you once worked on klibc packaging but gave up due to cdbs > > > usage, would you consider trying to switch

Bug#516670: Bug#573908: klibc packaging

2010-03-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:55:15PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > you once worked on klibc packaging but gave up due to cdbs > > usage, would you consider trying to switch latest klibc to dh? > > (away from cdbs) latest is on > > git clone git://g

Bug#573908: klibc packaging

2010-03-14 Thread maximilian attems
you once worked on klibc packaging but gave up due to cdbs usage, would you consider trying to switch latest klibc to dh? (away from cdbs) latest is on git clone git://git.debian.org/kernel/klibc.git improved packaging should help also #478589 to shipp README.ipconfig. I'd really appreciate this