Bug#573745: ping

2011-03-09 Thread Ian Jackson
Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Bug#573745: ping"): > Let's assume for a moment (very hypothetically!) that a team can be > found which both includes the current maintainer and has rough consensus > on -python. Would the CTTE be willing to establish such a team as > Pyt

Bug#573745: ping

2011-03-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 11:55:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > I think, and have for some time, that the ideal situation would be a > maintenance team that includes Matthias (assuming that Matthias still > cares deeply about the Python packaging and wants to continue to > participate). If such a

Bug#573745: ping

2011-03-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Sandro, On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 12:18:46PM +, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 22:58, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I would vote against this. > can you swear your NACK is completely unrelated to the fact you're a > collegue of Matthias in > Canonical/Linaro/whatever-umbrella-company-

Bug#573745: ping

2011-03-05 Thread Russ Allbery
Stefano Zacchiroli writes: > If the CTTE agrees, I will proceed as follow. I will propose, at my > discretion, a maintenance team that I hope could be accepted by all > involved parties. I'll ask for extra volunteers and for (motivated) > objections, trying to mediate in the discussion and reachi

Bug#573745: ping

2011-03-05 Thread Russ Allbery
Vincent Bernat writes: > Wow. Almost nobody uses python-central because python-support has a > friendly maintainer that helps people asking questions. Reversing the > situation seems quite biaised. For example, python-central does not > clean up old pyc files and there are numerous bugs report

Bug#573745: ping

2011-03-05 Thread Russ Allbery
Sandro Tosi writes: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 22:58, Steve Langasek wrote: >> I would vote against this. > can you swear your NACK is completely unrelated to the fact you're a > collegue of Matthias in > Canonical/Linaro/whatever-umbrella-company-is-now? What I think it's > important, is to unde

Bug#573745: ping

2011-03-05 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 22:58, Steve Langasek wrote: > I would vote against this. can you swear your NACK is completely unrelated to the fact you're a collegue of Matthias in Canonical/Linaro/whatever-umbrella-company-is-now? What I think it's important, is to understand if, and in what part, you

Bug#573745: ping

2011-03-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:33:27AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > AIUI at the moment the blocking problem is that we don't have a > suitable new team. The selection of the new team is not something the > ctte is any good at, and selecting maintainers by private email > exchanges is bad anyway becaus

Bug#573745: ping

2011-03-04 Thread Ian Jackson
Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Bug#573745: ping"): > 2 more months have passed, ... time for another ping :-) I have to say I'm very disappointed that we haven't managed to do a better job of this. We need to find a way to make this decision which does not become irretrievabl

Bug#573745: ping

2011-03-04 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:57:17AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > As ~2 more months have passed without a comment, I can't do any better > than pinging the CTTE again, AOL-ing the text above (especially the last > paragraph). > > As the decision is fully in the hands of the CTTE, I don't see a

Bug#573745: ping

2011-01-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Don & others, On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 05:58, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:16:32PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >> > All that said, one of the few remaining actions I can take on this >> > issue is to friendly ping the te

Bug#573745: ping

2011-01-03 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:16:32PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > All that said, one of the few remaining actions I can take on this > > issue is to friendly ping the tech-ctte to actually decide on this > > issue, open for 7 months now. I do t

Bug#573745: ping

2010-12-26 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:16:32PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > All that said, one of the few remaining actions I can take on this > issue is to friendly ping the tech-ctte to actually decide on this > issue, open for 7 months now. I do think tech-ctte is a very useful > device in Debian and

Bug#573745: ping

2010-11-06 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Dear Technical Committee members, as you might imagine I got asked fairly often what is the status of this issue. I've always made clear that any issue brought to the tech-ctte is no DPL matter; the Constitution is very clear about that. The only thing I could have done to help out a bit is tryi