On 15/03/10 at 10:23 +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
> wrote:
> > On 14/03/10 at 17:05 +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
> >> Building this package doesn't always fail. It depends on your build
> >> machine's memory and CPU.
> >
> > That build machine has 8 co
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> On 14/03/10 at 17:05 +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
>> Building this package doesn't always fail. It depends on your build
>> machine's memory and CPU.
>
> That build machine has 8 cores and 32 GB of RAM.
Please check ulimit values. One of them
On 14/03/10 at 17:05 +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
> Building this package doesn't always fail. It depends on your build
> machine's memory and CPU.
That build machine has 8 cores and 32 GB of RAM.
> Well actually I'm also the upstream author.. :) Building this package
> requires insanely HUGE mem
Building this package doesn't always fail. It depends on your build
machine's memory and CPU.
Well actually I'm also the upstream author.. :) Building this package
requires insanely HUGE memory and it takes a long time. It's mainly
because it uses a poor algorithm to build combinated words.
Thi
Source: hunspell-dict-ko
Version: 0.3.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100312 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering
5 matches
Mail list logo