On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> > Kamaraju,
> >
> > Overall I like your plan. And I'd like to help.
> >
> > I do not like starting with version 3.0.6. I think such an old version
> > is unlikely to attract many users and hence testing will be suboptimal.
> > In addition, upstrea
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> > Removing the package from unstable doesn't prevent you from working on
> > the package. It's just a way to clean up Debian. It will be very easy to
> > re-upload when you will have something that builds in i386 and amd64
> > (though it might be be
>
> My understanding is that upstream is very unhappy with the fact that
> Debian is shipping an old version, as it generates support requests for
> something that they don't want to support (3.0.5 was released on
> 2008-07-11).
>
Right. One of the points we have drive home to the users is that if
> Kamaraju,
>
> Overall I like your plan. And I'd like to help.
>
> I do not like starting with version 3.0.6. I think such an old version
> is unlikely to attract many users and hence testing will be suboptimal.
> In addition, upstream reports that upgrading to 4.5 is currently broken
> (http://
On 06/08/10 at 10:44 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
> wrote:
> > On 06/08/10 at 07:55 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> >> According to
> >> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=sagemath;ver=3.0.5dfsg-5.1;arch=alpha;stamp=1263382158
> >>
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:44:00AM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
> wrote:
> > On 06/08/10 at 07:55 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> >> According to
> >> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=sagemath;ver=3.0.5dfsg-5.1;arch=alpha;stamp=12
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 06/08/10 at 07:55 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
>> According to
>> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=sagemath;ver=3.0.5dfsg-5.1;arch=alpha;stamp=1263382158
>> the build of sagemath 3.0.5dfsg-5.1 failed due to a missing dependen
7 matches
Mail list logo