Hi Roger,
>
> > This patch has been tested, and we now have a patch for file-rc's
> > update-rc.d which makes use of it. Would it be possible to
> > enable this in a new upload so the file-rc change can go in? This
> > will enable dependency-based boot in file-rc and enable deprecation
> > and
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 07:12:03PM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> > > This patch has been tested, and we now have a patch for file-rc's
> > > update-rc.d which makes use of it. Would it be possible to
> > > enable this in a new upload so the file-rc change can go in? This
> > > will enable depende
[Roger Leigh]
> Hi Petter,
Hi.
> This patch has been tested, and we now have a patch for file-rc's
> update-rc.d which makes use of it. Would it be possible to
> enable this in a new upload so the file-rc change can go in? This
> will enable dependency-based boot in file-rc and enable deprecati
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 10:15:21PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Michael Prokop]
> > Thanks Kel. I just wanted to check this out and am wondering where I
> > can find this patch, the -s option neither seems to be supported
> > in insserv's current svn revision (1063) nor in Debian's
> > pack
* Petter Reinholdtsen [Mon Aug 02, 2010 at 10:15:21PM +0200]:
> [Michael Prokop]
> > Thanks Kel. I just wanted to check this out and am wondering where I
> > can find this patch, the -s option neither seems to be supported
> > in insserv's current svn revision (1063) nor in Debian's
> > package in
[Michael Prokop]
> Thanks Kel. I just wanted to check this out and am wondering where I
> can find this patch, the -s option neither seems to be supported
> in insserv's current svn revision (1063) nor in Debian's
> package insserv-1.14.0. Any hints?
It is 100_show.patch in
svn://svn.debian.org/in
* Kel Modderman [Mon Mai 03, 2010 at 08:38:40 +1000]:
> On Monday 08 March 2010 17:23:56 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Alexander Wirt]
> > > Therefore we would need a stable, machine parseable
> > > output. Something like
> > > S:NUM:RUNLEVELS:SCRIPT
> > > K:NUM:RUNLEVELS:SCRIPT
> > > or som
On Monday 08 March 2010 17:23:56 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Alexander Wirt]
> > Therefore we would need a stable, machine parseable
> > output. Something like
> >
> > S:NUM:RUNLEVELS:SCRIPT
> > K:NUM:RUNLEVELS:SCRIPT
> >
> > or something like this comes into mind.
>
> If upstream is willin
[Alexander Wirt]
> Therefore we would need a stable, machine parseable
> output. Something like
>
> S:NUM:RUNLEVELS:SCRIPT
> K:NUM:RUNLEVELS:SCRIPT
>
> or something like this comes into mind.
If upstream is willing, which I believe is the case but would have to
be verified, I would be happy t
Package: insserv
Version: 1.12.0-14
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
we are currently thinking about providing dependency based booting for
file-rc. As we don't want to reinvent the wheel, we are thinking about
using insserv as depenency resolver (which would have the advantage of
a consistent interface).
10 matches
Mail list logo