Bug#572839: [Fwd: Bug#572839: transition: graphviz]

2010-03-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 10 March 2010 at 15:04, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: | Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: | > e...@ron:~$ wajig policy libgraphviz-dev | > libgraphviz-dev: | > Installed: (none) | > Candidate: 2.20.2-8+b1 | > Version table: | > 2.20.2-8+b1 0 | > 990 http://ftp.us.debian.org testing/main

Bug#572839: [Fwd: Bug#572839: transition: graphviz]

2010-03-10 Thread Marc Brockschmidt
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > e...@ron:~$ wajig policy libgraphviz-dev > libgraphviz-dev: > Installed: (none) > Candidate: 2.20.2-8+b1 > Version table: > 2.20.2-8+b1 0 > 990 http://ftp.us.debian.org testing/main Packages > -1 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main Package

Bug#572839: UNS: Re: Bug#572839: [Fwd: Bug#572839: transition: graphviz]

2010-03-10 Thread Christoph Egger
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:49:49AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > e...@ron:~$ wajig policy libgraphviz-dev > libgraphviz-dev: > Installed: (none) > Candidate: 2.20.2-8+b1 > Version table: > 2.20.2-8+b1 0 > 990 http://ftp.us.debian.org testing/main Packages > -1 http:/

Bug#572839: [Fwd: Bug#572839: transition: graphviz]

2010-03-10 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 10 March 2010 at 11:38, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: | Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: | > On 10 March 2010 at 01:22, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: | >> Christoph Egger writes: | >>> graphviz should now already sit in incoming (provided I didn't | >>> mess up uploading again). | >> Yep, it's in

Bug#572839: [Fwd: Bug#572839: transition: graphviz]

2010-03-10 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > On 10 March 2010 at 01:22, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >> Christoph Egger writes: >>> graphviz should now already sit in incoming (provided I didn't >>> mess up uploading again). >> Yep, it's in the archive now. I have scheduled the needed binNMUs. > I am not see

Bug#572839: [Fwd: Bug#572839: transition: graphviz]

2010-03-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 10 March 2010 at 01:22, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: | Christoph Egger writes: | > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:05:47PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | >> On 9 March 2010 at 21:33, David Claughton wrote: | >> | That would be the latest 2.26.3 version. It's in experimental now, | >> | unfortu

Bug#572839: transition: graphviz

2010-03-09 Thread David Claughton
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > If you have verified that these packages all build with the new sources, > you can do it tomorrow and we will do this quickly before taking on the > directfb soname bump. Please ping us again after you've uploaded, so > that we can schedule the needed binNMUs. > > M

Bug#572839: [Fwd: Bug#572839: transition: graphviz]

2010-03-09 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Christoph Egger writes: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:05:47PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >> On 9 March 2010 at 21:33, David Claughton wrote: >> | That would be the latest 2.26.3 version. It's in experimental now, >> | unfortunately I overlooked that ggobi doesn't compile against it (as it >>

Bug#572839: [Fwd: Bug#572839: transition: graphviz]

2010-03-09 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi all! On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:05:47PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 9 March 2010 at 21:33, David Claughton wrote: > | That would be the latest 2.26.3 version. It's in experimental now, > | unfortunately I overlooked that ggobi doesn't compile against it (as it > | stands), or I would

Bug#572839: transition: graphviz

2010-03-08 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
David Claughton writes: > I sent the following to the list last week but didn't get a response - > maybe it fell through the cracks? Yeah, sorry for this, we are currently a bit understaffed. Pinging for issues we seem to have lost is appreciated. > Graphviz 2.26.3 has been in experimental for j

Bug#572839: transition: graphviz

2010-03-06 Thread David Claughton
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** Hi, I sent the following to the list last week but didn't get a response - maybe it fell through the cracks? If so, that might have been