On 15/04/10 20:53, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Apr 15, Meelis Roos wrote:
Please find out exactly which operation is causing the traps.
Are there any news?
After some digging I could not find out how to interpret these adresses
and to correlate them against the binary.
I could recompile depmod
On 15/04/10 20:53, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Apr 15, Meelis Roos wrote:
Please find out exactly which operation is causing the traps.
Are there any news?
I just found a moment to look at this:
Core was generated by `depmod -a'.
Program terminated with signal 10, Bus error.
#0 0x00012000
On Apr 15, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > Please find out exactly which operation is causing the traps.
> > Are there any news?
>
> After some digging I could not find out how to interpret these adresses
> and to correlate them against the binary.
>
> I could recompile depmod to instrument it with s
> > > While running depmod -a on my alpha system, dmesg tells depmod is causing
> > > unaligned traps:
> > Please find out exactly which operation is causing the traps.
> Are there any news?
After some digging I could not find out how to interpret these adresses
and to correlate them against the
On Mar 04, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > While running depmod -a on my alpha system, dmesg tells depmod is causing
> > unaligned traps:
> Please find out exactly which operation is causing the traps.
Are there any news?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mar 04, Meelis Roos wrote:
> While running depmod -a on my alpha system, dmesg tells depmod is causing
> unaligned traps:
Please find out exactly which operation is causing the traps.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: module-init-tools
Version: 3.12~pre1-1
Severity: normal
While running depmod -a on my alpha system, dmesg tells depmod is causing
unaligned traps:
[ 52.705051] depmod(970): unaligned trap at 00012000b43c:
0001200136f2 28 0
[ 52.727512] depmo
7 matches
Mail list logo
