Bug#571494: ldns: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default

2010-03-01 Thread Ondřej Surý
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:22, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Ondřej Surý wrote: >> 2010/2/27 Bernd Zeimetz : >>> Then use debian/pyversions or similar ways to limit the package to build >>> with >>> supported Python versions. Just using the default Python version is not the >>> proper way for packaging P

Bug#571494: ldns: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default

2010-03-01 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Ondřej Surý wrote: > 2010/2/27 Bernd Zeimetz : >> Then use debian/pyversions or similar ways to limit the package to build with >> supported Python versions. Just using the default Python version is not the >> proper way for packaging Python modules and programs. Python 2.5 is not >> gone, so >> j

Bug#571494: ldns: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default

2010-03-01 Thread Ondřej Surý
2010/2/27 Bernd Zeimetz : > Then use debian/pyversions or similar ways to limit the package to build with > supported Python versions. Just using the default Python version is not the > proper way for packaging Python modules and programs. Python 2.5 is not gone, > so > just fix your packaging ple

Bug#571494: ldns: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default

2010-02-27 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Ondřej Surý wrote: > 2010/2/25 Jakub Wilk : >> * Ondřej Surý , 2010-02-25, 20:07: >>> had Debian alredy switched to python2.6 as default version? >> No, not yet. If it did, this bug would have severity serious. > > I didn't see this transition announced to debian-announce (hint), so I > didn't kno

Bug#571494: ldns: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default

2010-02-25 Thread Ondřej Surý
2010/2/25 Jakub Wilk : > * Ondřej Surý , 2010-02-25, 20:07: >> >> had Debian alredy switched to python2.6 as default version? > > No, not yet. If it did, this bug would have severity serious. I didn't see this transition announced to debian-announce (hint), so I didn't know that it's even in prepa

Bug#571494: ldns: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default

2010-02-25 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Ondřej Surý , 2010-02-25, 20:07: had Debian alredy switched to python2.6 as default version? No, not yet. If it did, this bug would have severity serious. Sid still has python2.5 as default version, so why this has important severity? I believe it's standard practice to give important sev

Bug#571494: ldns: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default

2010-02-25 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi, had Debian alredy switched to python2.6 as default version? Sid still has python2.5 as default version, so why this has important severity? Ondrej 2010/2/25 Jakub Wilk : > Source: ldns > Version: 1.6.4-3 > Severity: important > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: python2.6 > >

Bug#571494: ldns: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default

2010-02-25 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: ldns Version: 1.6.4-3 Severity: important User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python2.6 Hello, When rebuilt in an environment with Python 2.6 as the default version, your package failed to build from source. Here are the relevant parts of the build log: | checking for pyth