Bug#570758: opensm-doc package not removed

2010-02-24 Thread Benoit Mortier
Le Wednesday 24 February 2010 13:58:53 Torsten Werner, vous avez écrit : > Benoit Mortier schrieb: > > so how can i correct this because the opensm package is needed for > > other packages to enter testing and this block the rest of the ofed > > stack ? > > I have removed the -1 doc package. Versio

Bug#570758: opensm-doc package not removed

2010-02-24 Thread Torsten Werner
Benoit Mortier schrieb: > so how can i correct this because the opensm package is needed for other > packages to enter testing and this block the rest of the ofed stack ? I have removed the -1 doc package. Version -2 should transition into testing now. Cheers, Torsten -- __

Bug#570758: opensm-doc package not removed

2010-02-24 Thread Benoit Mortier
Le Wednesday 24 February 2010 10:56:05 Torsten Werner, vous avez écrit : > Alexander Reichle-Schmehl schrieb: > > But surely the drive isn't shipped in the -doc package? Is the > > documentation different for each architecture? > > No, the documentation is identical on all supported architectures

Bug#570758: opensm-doc package not removed

2010-02-24 Thread Benoit Mortier
Le Wednesday 24 February 2010 10:44:40, vous avez écrit : > Hi! > > Benoit Mortier schrieb: > >> opensm-doc | 3.2.6-20090317-1 | unstable | all > >> opensm-doc | 3.2.6-20090317-2 | unstable | amd64, i386, ia64, > >> powerpc > >> > >> Why has the Architecture: all package been moved to Arc

Bug#570758: opensm-doc package not removed

2010-02-24 Thread Torsten Werner
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl schrieb: > But surely the drive isn't shipped in the -doc package? Is the > documentation different for each architecture? No, the documentation is identical on all supported architectures and that is why it should be an arch all package. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUB

Bug#570758: opensm-doc package not removed

2010-02-24 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Benoit Mortier schrieb: opensm-doc | 3.2.6-20090317-1 | unstable | all opensm-doc | 3.2.6-20090317-2 | unstable | amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc Why has the Architecture: all package been moved to Architecture: i386 ia64 amd64 powerpc? Does that make sense? Yes thats right, because t

Bug#570758: opensm-doc package not removed

2010-02-24 Thread Benoit Mortier
Le Wednesday 24 February 2010 00:05:03 Torsten Werner, vous avez écrit : > Hi, > > Benoit Mortier schrieb: > > the opensm-doc pacckage has not been removed for alpha, armel, hppa, > > kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, s390, sparc > > we have: > > opensm-doc | 3.2.6-20090317-1 | unst

Bug#570758: opensm-doc package not removed

2010-02-23 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, Benoit Mortier schrieb: > the opensm-doc pacckage has not been removed for alpha, armel, hppa, > kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, s390, sparc we have: opensm-doc | 3.2.6-20090317-1 | unstable | all opensm-doc | 3.2.6-20090317-2 | unstable | amd64, i386, ia64, powerpc

Bug#570758: opensm-doc package not removed

2010-02-23 Thread Benoit Mortier
Hello, the opensm-doc pacckage has not been removed for alpha, armel, hppa, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, s390, sparc Could you remove it Thanks -- Benoit Mortier CEO OpenSides "logiciels libres pour entreprises" : http://www.opensides.eu/ Promouvoir et défendre le Logiciel Li