Jörg Sommer writes:
> Okay, is it worth to add such a comment to the message, saying cdbs
> users have to build‐depend on autotools-dev, because the recommends of
> cdbs is not enough?
That's the intent of the last sentence of the tag description:
windlord:~> lintian-info -t outdated-autotools-
Hi Russ,
Russ Allbery hat am Tue 16. Feb, 09:27 (-0800) geschrieben:
> Jörg Sommer writes:
> > Russ Allbery hat am Mon 15. Feb, 17:10 (-0800) geschrieben:
>
> >> No, you still need to build-depend on the appropriate packages, even if
> >> cdbs is in use. cdbs itself does not do so, and if you d
Jörg Sommer writes:
> Russ Allbery hat am Mon 15. Feb, 17:10 (-0800) geschrieben:
>> No, you still need to build-depend on the appropriate packages, even if
>> cdbs is in use. cdbs itself does not do so, and if you don't have an
>> appropriate build-depends, cdbs will not update the files.
> cd
Hallo Russ,
Russ Allbery hat am Mon 15. Feb, 17:10 (-0800) geschrieben:
> Jörg Sommer writes:
>
> > if a package build‐depends on cdbs and the rules file contains the line
> > “include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk”, everything is fine,
> > because cdbs updates the autotools files.
>
> N
Jörg Sommer writes:
> if a package build‐depends on cdbs and the rules file contains the line
> “include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk”, everything is fine,
> because cdbs updates the autotools files.
No, you still need to build-depend on the appropriate packages, even if
cdbs is in use.
Package: lintian
Version: 2.3.3
Severity: normal
Hi,
if a package build‐depends on cdbs and the rules file contains the line
“include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/autotools.mk”, everything is fine,
because cdbs updates the autotools files.
Bye, Jörg.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: unstable/e
6 matches
Mail list logo
