Bug#568733: aptitude: New full-upgrade behavior breaks pkgsync

2010-03-27 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:23:45AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote: > Can't you just add "?upgradable" as the first argument following > full-upgrade? It seems to me like that should give you the old behavior > back while being backwards-compatible (and if I'm wrong, I need to fix > NEWS.Debian, sin

Bug#568733: aptitude: New full-upgrade behavior breaks pkgsync

2010-03-12 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 12:43:23PM +0100, "Steinar H. Gunderson" was heard to say: > It seems that recently, aptitude changed behavior such that a command-line > such as > > aptitude full-upgrade ed+ > > will only upgrade ed -- earlier, it would install ed and then full a normal > full-upgra

Bug#568733: aptitude: New full-upgrade behavior breaks pkgsync

2010-02-07 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
Package: aptitude Version: 0.6.1.5-2 Severity: important Hi, It seems that recently, aptitude changed behavior such that a command-line such as aptitude full-upgrade ed+ will only upgrade ed -- earlier, it would install ed and then full a normal full-upgrade. (The changelog mentions a NEWS e