Bug#567879: Please add resolvconf integration

2011-02-16 Thread Phil Vandry
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:33:54 -0500 Robert Edmonds wrote: > note that the stock unbound package does not set up unbound-control: Good point. > the BIND9 equivalent to unbound-control is rndc, and i believe the bind9 > package automatically sets up the necessary rndc shared secret. > > should the

Bug#567879: Please add resolvconf integration

2011-02-16 Thread Robert Edmonds
Phil Vandry wrote: > Hello again Martin, > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:48:30AM +1300, martin f. krafft wrote: > > +if ! echo "$MD5SUM" | md5sum -c 2>&1; then > > + invoke-rc.d unbound force-reload > > +fi > > For unbound, force-reload is actually the same as restart, so > you are forcing it to

Bug#567879: Please add resolvconf integration

2011-02-16 Thread Phil Vandry
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 08:11:43PM -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote: > i think you are mistaken. in practice, unbound (or bind or any other > reasonably compliant full service DNS resolver / cache) only sends > occasional queries to the root; running unbound in normal recursive full > service mode does

Bug#567879: Please add resolvconf integration

2011-02-16 Thread Phil Vandry
Hello again Martin, On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:48:30AM +1300, martin f. krafft wrote: > +if ! echo "$MD5SUM" | md5sum -c 2>&1; then > + invoke-rc.d unbound force-reload > +fi For unbound, force-reload is actually the same as restart, so you are forcing it to restart (including discarding the con

Bug#567879: Please add resolvconf integration

2010-01-31 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Robert Edmonds [2010.02.01.1411 +1300]: > i think you are mistaken. in practice, unbound (or bind or any > other reasonably compliant full service DNS resolver / cache) only > sends occasional queries to the root; running unbound in normal > recursive full service mode doesn't "hammer

Bug#567879: Please add resolvconf integration

2010-01-31 Thread Robert Edmonds
martin f krafft wrote: > Of course it works the other way, but if everyone out there hammered > the root-servers, then they'd have a huge problem. > > > (by root servers, i think you meant content servers, btw.) > > No, I meant the root-servers, i.e. the servers responsible for the > '.' zone. i

Bug#567879: Please add resolvconf integration

2010-01-31 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Robert Edmonds [2010.02.01.1338 +1300]: > > I want to use unbound locally to be able to use e.g. local-data, > > and to stub some zones. > > ah, so you have some sort of split horizon DNS setup? in the past > i've seen this done with dnscache, dnsmasq, and i believe it's in > fact bu

Bug#567879: Please add resolvconf integration

2010-01-31 Thread Robert Edmonds
martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Robert Edmonds [2010.02.01.1207 +1300]: > > can you please explain exactly what this does and how it relates to > > #562031? > > My script supplements #562031, which talks only about how to teach > the system to ask localhost (or whereever unbound listens). Th

Bug#567879: Please add resolvconf integration

2010-01-31 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Robert Edmonds [2010.02.01.1207 +1300]: > can you please explain exactly what this does and how it relates to > #562031? My script supplements #562031, which talks only about how to teach the system to ask localhost (or whereever unbound listens). The way I do this is by adding dns

Bug#567879: Please add resolvconf integration

2010-01-31 Thread Robert Edmonds
martin f. krafft wrote: > Package: unbound > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > Signed-off-by: martin f. krafft > --- > contrib/resolvconf-update-script.sh | 42 > + > debian/patches/30_example_conf_resolvconf_include | 14 +++ > debian/patches/series

Bug#567879: Please add resolvconf integration

2010-01-31 Thread martin f. krafft
Package: unbound Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Signed-off-by: martin f. krafft --- contrib/resolvconf-update-script.sh | 42 + debian/patches/30_example_conf_resolvconf_include | 14 +++ debian/patches/series |1 + debian