Bug#567770: e16 RC bugs

2010-10-11 Thread Tim Retout
On 11 October 2010 19:16, Laurence J. Lane wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl > wrote: > >> PS: My understanding was, that you would prefer to add /etc/e16 to the >> searchpath for config files of e16 itself; as you can see I haven't >> implemented that, but tried

Bug#567770: e16 RC bugs

2010-10-11 Thread Laurence J. Lane
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > PS: My understanding was, that you would prefer to add /etc/e16 to the > searchpath for config files of e16 itself; as you can see I haven't > implemented that, but tried to fix "my" symlinks.  I thought that would > be the prefe

Bug#567770: e16 RC bugs

2010-10-11 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi Tim! * Tim Retout [101009 15:22]: > Normally I would not ask in advance like this, but I notice that #567770 > was actually caused by the NMU upload for #552046, so I recognise this > could get pretty inflammatory if I were to cause more problems. Yes, I'm really sorry for causing that mess

Bug#567770: e16 RC bugs

2010-10-10 Thread Laurence J. Lane
Remove it or NMU. No delay is necessary. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#567770: e16 RC bugs

2010-10-09 Thread Tim Retout
Hi Laurence, e16 has these open RC bugs: http://bugs.debian.org/567770 (config files/upgrades) http://bugs.debian.org/572465 (autopoint build-dep) We are getting closer to the release of Squeeze, and these bugs have to be resolved. The options are, in order of preference: * Maintainer up