Hi Cleto,
On Donnerstag, 10. Juni 2010, Cleto Martin Angelina wrote:
> Hi! Sorry about my lag :-)...
no problem at all, I'm lagging too ;-)
> Mainly, the patch is based on the documentation of apt-cache. Its
> manual page say that "apt-cache returns zero on normal operation,
> decimal 100 on err
tags 566672 + patch
thanks.
Hi! Sorry about my lag :-)...
I think the attached patch solves this problem. I have tested it with
two packages: first one is known by apt-get previously and upgrade
test is done for it. The other package is not known, so piuparts
informs about that the upgrade test i
Hi Cleto,
I'm really sorry for the late reply! I'm very happy about you hacking on
piuparts and I know how the lack of my feedback slowed that down. I'm quite
unhappy about this, but such is life...
On Dienstag, 4. Mai 2010, Cleto Martin Angelina wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm writing a patch for this b
Hi!
I'm writing a patch for this bug and after taking a look at code I
have some questions:
if not settings.no_upgrade_test:
if not settings.args_are_package_files:
logging.info("Can't test upgrades: -a or --apt option used.")
elif not chroot.apt_get_knows(packages):
logg
package: piuparts
x-debbugs-cc: debian-ment...@lists.debian.org, henr...@debian.or.jp,
steffen.joe...@skolelinux.de
Hi Hideki,
congratulations! You found a bug in piuparts! :-)
On Samstag, 23. Januar 2010, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > 0m38.1s INFO: PASS: Installation and purging test.
> > 0m38.1s D
5 matches
Mail list logo
