Bug#564160: 3.2.0

2011-02-14 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Le dimanche 13 février 2011 à 22:45 +0200, Stefano Rivera a écrit : > Hi Olivier (2010.12.23_10:21:35_+0200) > > I think it would be good to have it packaged ASAP, and possibly included > > in squeeze... although the freeze rules may not allow it. > > I've taken over maintenance of this packa

Bug#564160: 3.2.0

2011-02-13 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Olivier (2010.12.23_10:21:35_+0200) > I think it would be good to have it packaged ASAP, and possibly included > in squeeze... although the freeze rules may not allow it. I've taken over maintenance of this package now. I think it's too late to do something this drastic for squeeze, via squeez

Bug#564160: 3.2.0

2010-12-23 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 à 19:51 -0500, Decklin Foster a écrit : > Excerpts from Clint Adams's message of Wed Dec 22 14:53:23 -0500 2010: > > Is updating to 3.2.0 a better solution? > > Looks like it. I'll run some tests and see if there's any problematic > changes in 3.0.8 (code diff fro

Bug#564160: 3.2.0

2010-12-22 Thread Decklin Foster
Excerpts from Clint Adams's message of Wed Dec 22 14:53:23 -0500 2010: > Is updating to 3.2.0 a better solution? Looks like it. I'll run some tests and see if there's any problematic changes in 3.0.8 (code diff from 3.0.8.1 to 3.2.0 is minimal.) -- things change. deck...@red-bean.com -- To UN

Bug#564160: 3.2.0

2010-12-22 Thread Clint Adams
Is updating to 3.2.0 a better solution? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org