Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 10 Birželis 2010 22:55:20 Russ Allbery wrote:
> Yesterday, I did a survey of all licenses in Debian, which among other
> things attempted to locate all uses of this license by either its title
> (case-insensitive and whitespace-insensitive) or via the DEP-5 format.
> The r
Modestas Vainius writes:
> On the other hand, 130+ packages is not such a small number so those
> licenses are still "common" just to a lesser extent. I tend not to view
> "common" as "very popular" but rather "shared by multiple things". So I
> wonder what are the disadvantages of including them
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> In my opinion, DFSG-free Create Commons v3.0 licenses are already
> common enough to be included in /usr/share/common-licenses:
>
> CC-BY-3.0 - Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported:
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
> http://crea
reassign 562920 debian-policy
thanks
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Package: base-files
> Version: 5.0.0
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello,
>
> In my opinion, DFSG-free Create Commons v3.0 licenses are already common
> enough
> to be included in /usr/share/common-licenses:
>
> CC
Package: base-files
Version: 5.0.0
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
In my opinion, DFSG-free Create Commons v3.0 licenses are already common enough
to be included in /usr/share/common-licenses:
CC-BY-3.0 - Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
http:/
5 matches
Mail list logo
