Bug#562799: /usr/bin/dpkg is installed with 000 permission

2009-12-28 Thread Cameron Horsburgh
Thanks for the reply. You're correct---that command gives root root 0 /usr/bin/dpkg I ran the dpkg-statoverride command and I couldn't reproduce the behaviour, so it seems the issue is resolved. Is this a problem peculiar to my system, or have I found a real live bug? :-) Thanks for your help.

Bug#562799: /usr/bin/dpkg is installed with 000 permission

2009-12-28 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-12-28 07:48 +0100, Cameron Horsburgh wrote: > came...@jupiter:~/Downloads$ ls -l /usr/bin/dpkg > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 371824 Dec 23 03:26 /usr/bin/dpkg > came...@jupiter:~/Downloads$ sudo dpkg -i dpkg_1.15.5.5_i386.deb > [sudo] password for cameron: > (Reading database ... 290683 files a

Bug#562799: /usr/bin/dpkg is installed with 000 permission

2009-12-27 Thread Cameron Horsburgh
Hmm, this is a little strange. I was surprised that the BTS hadn't blown up with all the reports, so there must be something screwy with my system. My / partition is a little tight, but not so tight that it causes problems for any other packages. Here's a CLI session reproducing the problem. The d

Bug#562799: /usr/bin/dpkg is installed with 000 permission

2009-12-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
tag 562799 unreproducible moreinfo severity 562799 important thanks On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, Cameron Horsburgh wrote: > dpkg stopped working after installing this version of the > package. Investigation revealed that /usr/bin/dpkg had permissions > of 000. `chmod 755 /usr/bin/dpkg` fixed the problem.

Bug#562799: /usr/bin/dpkg is installed with 000 permission

2009-12-27 Thread Cameron Horsburgh
Package: dpkg Version: 1.15.5.5 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8