On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 06:20:41AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:16:40PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > SH-4A supports synco, SH-4 does not. SH-4A is based on the SH-4, but has
> > > a lot of new instructions and so forth. Folks lik
On Tue, Dec 22 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:16:40PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > SH-4A supports synco, SH-4 does not. SH-4A is based on the SH-4, but has
> > > a lot of new instructions and so forth. Folks like to treat them the s
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:16:40PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > SH-4A supports synco, SH-4 does not. SH-4A is based on the SH-4, but has
> > a lot of new instructions and so forth. Folks like to treat them the same
> > so as to keep the same ABI, but there a
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:47:46AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> +#define nop __asm__ __volatile__ ("nop": : :"memory")
> +#define read_barrier() __asm__ __volatile__ (" " : : : "memory")
> +#define write_barrier() __asm__ __volatile__ (" " : : : "memory")
This is true for SH-4, b
On Tue, Dec 22 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:57:21PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:47:46AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > > > +#define nop __asm__ __volatile__ ("nop": : :"memory")
> > > >
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:57:21PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:47:46AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > > +#define nop __asm__ __volatile__ ("nop": : :"memory")
> > > +#define read_barrier() __asm__ __volatile__ ("
Hi, Paul.
Thank you for your comment.
2009/12/22 Paul Mundt :
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:47:46AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> +#define nop __asm__ __volatile__ ("nop": : :"memory")
>> +#define read_barrier() __asm__ __volatile__ (" " : : : "memory")
>> +#define write_barrier(
On Tue, Dec 22 2009, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi, Paul.
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> 2009/12/22 Paul Mundt :
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:47:46AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> >> +#define nop __asm__ __volatile__ ("nop": : :"memory")
> >> +#define read_barrier() __asm_
h.h file in your latest fio 1.36 archive. (I
> didn't look before, cause I assumed it was there.)
>
>> > -- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
>> >
>> > Betreff: Bug#561891: Please support sh4
>> > Datum: Montag, 21. Dezember 2009
>> &g
On Tue, Dec 22 2009, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:47:46AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> > +#define nop __asm__ __volatile__ ("nop": : :"memory")
> > +#define read_barrier() __asm__ __volatile__ (" " : : : "memory")
> > +#define write_barrier() __asm__ __volatile__
in the Debian package.
>
> I seem to be missing some bits, I don't have sh support integrated. Is
> there a predecessor to this patch?
Hmmm, indeed I do not see a arch-sh.h file in your latest fio 1.36 archive. (I
didn't look before, cause I assumed it was there.)
> >
lease with this patch upstream, I will take it from you. Otherwise I
will temporarily include it in the Debian package.
Ciao,
Martin
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Betreff: Bug#561891: Please support sh4
Datum: Montag, 21. Dezember 2009
Von: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
An: Debian Bug Tra
ere a predecessor to this patch?
>
> Ciao,
> Martin
>
> ------ Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
>
> Betreff: Bug#561891: Please support sh4
> Datum: Montag, 21. Dezember 2009
> Von: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
> An: Debian Bug Tracking System
>
> Package: fio
Package: fio
Version: 1.33.1-1
Severity: important
User: debian-...@superh.org
Tags: patch
Usertags: sh4
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH(sh4) CPU.
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?suite=unstable&a=sh4
fio FTBFS on
14 matches
Mail list logo
