On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 01:35:43AM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > There is no risk of breakage in optimised code with -O2 or more.
>
> For my education -- could you please explain why? (No need to quote the
> C99 standard, just give me the intuition.)
>
It is a false positive due to the f
> There is no risk of breakage in optimised code with -O2 or more.
For my education -- could you please explain why? (No need to quote the
C99 standard, just give me the intuition.)
Juliusz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.deb
severity 561691 wishlist
tag 561691 + wontfix
thanks
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 06:03:48PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Package: libc6-dev
> Version: 2.10.2-2
>
> Type punning between pointers to struct sockaddr, struct sockaddr_storage
> and sockaddr_in(6) is explicitly required by the socket
Package: libc6-dev
Version: 2.10.2-2
Type punning between pointers to struct sockaddr, struct sockaddr_storage
and sockaddr_in(6) is explicitly required by the sockets interface. For
example, RFC 3493 Section 3.8 gives the following example:
if (bind(s, (struct sockaddr *) &sin6, sizeof(si
4 matches
Mail list logo
