Bug#561380: coreutils: FTBFS: Regression test failures.

2010-01-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 08:51:58PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:40:58AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 07:21:14PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > >>>and failed on alpha with "FAIL: test-fstatat" like it did before. > >> > >>What kernel is that running

Bug#561380: coreutils: FTBFS: Regression test failures.

2010-01-16 Thread Michael Stone
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:40:58AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 07:21:14PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: >and failed on alpha with "FAIL: test-fstatat" like it did before. What kernel is that running? Usually errors with fstatat are caused by unsupported (old) kernel versions

Bug#561380: coreutils: FTBFS: Regression test failures.

2010-01-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 07:21:14PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > >and failed on alpha with "FAIL: test-fstatat" like it did before. > > What kernel is that running? Usually errors with fstatat are caused > by unsupported (old) kernel versions. 2.6.30-bpo.2-alpha-generic Kurt -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#561380: coreutils: FTBFS: Regression test failures.

2010-01-16 Thread Michael Stone
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:25:47AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: So it worked now on amd64 (on brahms, the one using xfs), Ok, I'll see if I can dup on xfs also. I've also passed the issue to upstream. (The basic issue seems to be whether or not setting utime alters ctime, which is an assumption

Bug#561380: coreutils: FTBFS: Regression test failures.

2010-01-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 04:48:11PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > > Ok, different problem. Does the second buildd use btrfs by any > chance? I can duplicate the misc/ls-time failure on btrfs on my > local i386 and have disabled that test for now in the 8.4-1 package. So it worked now on amd64 (on

Bug#561380: coreutils: FTBFS: Regression test failures.

2010-01-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 04:48:11PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:33:44AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:01:31PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > >>On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 07:46:46PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >>>There was an error while trying to au

Bug#561380: coreutils: FTBFS: Regression test failures.

2009-12-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:01:31PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 07:46:46PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > >There was an error while trying to autobuild your package on amd64 > >and alpha. > > > >On amd64 we got: > >FAIL: touch/no-dereference > >FAIL: touch/trailing-slash > >

Bug#561380: coreutils: FTBFS: Regression test failures.

2009-12-16 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 07:46:46PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: There was an error while trying to autobuild your package on amd64 and alpha. On amd64 we got: FAIL: touch/no-dereference FAIL: touch/trailing-slash I'm assuming this is a build environment failure, but I'm having trouble with my am

Bug#561380: coreutils: FTBFS: Regression test failures.

2009-12-16 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Source: coreutils Version: 8.1-1 Severity: serious Hi, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package on amd64 and alpha. On amd64 we got: FAIL: touch/no-dereference FAIL: touch/trailing-slash On alpha: /bin/bash: line 1: 5947 Aborted EXEEXT='' USE_ACL=1 EXEEXT='' E