On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 02:20:32PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> However, I plan to open a new bug about the fact that
> embedded expat library is used rather than the system version; if that
> is OK?
It would probably be useful to have a bug against lintian asking
that it checks that a package
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:58:54PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I think you're both not understanding each other.
>
> As I understand it, Michael is saying that the patch for the
> security issue is not applied to the package in Debian and
> that upstream has fixed that for the next release.
>
Th
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 02:20:32PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
> If Franseco's analysis is correct, then I agree that the bug should
> remain closed. However, I plan to open a new bug about the fact that
> embedded expat library is used rather than the system version; if that
> is OK?
>
Yes
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:20:32 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> If Franseco's analysis is correct, then I agree that the bug should
> remain closed. However, I plan to open a new bug about the fact that
> embedded expat library is used rather than the system version; if that
> is OK?
correction: the
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:58:54 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I think you're both not understanding each other.
>
> As I understand it, Michael is saying that the patch for the
> security issue is not applied to the package in Debian and
> that upstream has fixed that for the next release.
>
> As I un
I think you're both not understanding each other.
As I understand it, Michael is saying that the patch for the
security issue is not applied to the package in Debian and
that upstream has fixed that for the next release.
As I understand Francesco, there is no need to apply the patch
because it's
6 matches
Mail list logo
