On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 07:57:51 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > This did not seem to get any attention on debian-devel, so I am cross
> > posting to debian-release. I would really be interested to know if
> > others think that the binNMU approach suggested by Matthias is
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 07:57:51AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > This did not seem to get any attention on debian-devel, so I am cross
> > posting to debian-release. I would really be interested to know if
> > others think that the binNMU approach suggested by Matthias is
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> This did not seem to get any attention on debian-devel, so I am cross
> posting to debian-release. I would really be interested to know if
> others think that the binNMU approach suggested by Matthias is
> acceptable and/or viable.
Unless it's an option to include opro
This did not seem to get any attention on debian-devel, so I am cross
posting to debian-release. I would really be interested to know if
others think that the binNMU approach suggested by Matthias is
acceptable and/or viable.
Regards,
-Roberto
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>
Matthias Klose wrote:
> tags 558412 + wontfix
> thanks
>
> On 28.11.2009 19:10, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> Package: binutils-dev
>> Version: 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> In order to solve #537744 (filed against oprofile), i
Package: binutils-dev
Version: 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In order to solve #537744 (filed against oprofile), it is necessary for
binutils-dev to provide a libbfd_pic.a library. This is like what is
already done for libiberity_pic.a.
Rega
6 matches
Mail list logo
