[Ron]
> So if you just want to get this off the triage radar, that seems like
> the better option to me - unless I'm missing something like there
> being an actual ABI change about to happen.
My main goal is to get it off the bug list, but bringing it in line with
other dev packages in Debian and
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 12:05:34AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> So, perhaps now is a good time to rename the -dev package?
> What do the rest of you think? Any of you have time to follow
> up the migration process? I doubt I will any time soon. :(
Personally, I don't see much value in gra
So, perhaps now is a good time to rename the -dev package?
What do the rest of you think? Any of you have time to follow
up the migration process? I doubt I will any time soon. :(
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Control: tags -1 + patch
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> A quick search on https://codesearch.debian.net/ indicate that
> at least the following packages need to have their build dependencies
> changed:
>
> roaraudio
> sonic-visualiser
I checked the Sources file in the archive, and these two are the
So, six years ago there was a proposal to rename libfishsound1-dev
to libfishsound-dev. This sound like a good idea, but will
require some work. Is it worth it?
A quick search on https://codesearch.debian.net/ indicate that
at least the following packages need to have their build dependencies
ch
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 09:51:01PM +1100, John Ferlito wrote:
> close 557765
> tags 557765 wontfix
>
> The debian packaging guide says you can do it both ways and there
> doesn't seem to be a consensus on the right way. I'm going to leave it
> as is.
You can do it both ways, but which way you sho
close 557765
tags 557765 wontfix
The debian packaging guide says you can do it both ways and there
doesn't seem to be a consensus on the right way. I'm going to leave it
as is.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:06:11AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> The -dev package should be named libfishsound-dev, withou
Package: libfishsound1-dev
Version: 0.9.2-3
Severity: important
The -dev package should be named libfishsound-dev, without the 1, so that
reverse dependencies don't need to bump their build dependency whenever
the ABI changes.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unsta
8 matches
Mail list logo
