Le mardi 24 novembre 2009 à 13:18 +0100, David Kalnischkies a écrit :
> The problem simply is that the package libesd-alsa0 has a higher
> scoring than libesd0 and therefore apt thinks it is a bad idea to remove
> libesd-alsa0 (you can see this with the debug option for the resolver
> yourself) in
Hello Josselin & Rick,
First of all: Thanks for the report! :)
2009/11/24 Josselin Mouette :
> Le lundi 23 novembre 2009 à 15:58 -0500, Rick Thomas a écrit :
>> On Nov 23, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> > Le dimanche 22 novembre 2009 à 17:43 -0500, Rick Thomas a écrit :
>> > The cor
reassign 557570 apt
thanks
Le lundi 23 novembre 2009 à 15:58 -0500, Rick Thomas a écrit :
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > Le dimanche 22 novembre 2009 à 17:43 -0500, Rick Thomas a écrit :
> >> Package: esound-clients
> >> Version: 0.2.41-5
> >> Severity: normal
> >>
On Nov 23, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 22 novembre 2009 à 17:43 -0500, Rick Thomas a écrit :
Package: esound-clients
Version: 0.2.41-5
Severity: normal
esound-clients is one of 4 packages that patitude cannot upgrade ob
my sid PowerPC testing machine.
Here's the
Le dimanche 22 novembre 2009 à 17:43 -0500, Rick Thomas a écrit :
> Package: esound-clients
> Version: 0.2.41-5
> Severity: normal
>
> esound-clients is one of 4 packages that patitude cannot upgrade ob my sid
> PowerPC testing machine.
>
> Here's the output...
>
> dillserver:~# aptitude -Pv f
Package: esound-clients
Version: 0.2.41-5
Severity: normal
esound-clients is one of 4 packages that patitude cannot upgrade ob my sid
PowerPC testing machine.
Here's the output...
dillserver:~# aptitude -Pv full-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading stat
6 matches
Mail list logo
