On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 21:10 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello Ben,
>
> On Tuesday 17 Aug 2010 06:05:35 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Please add the check for DEBUG, and test that the result works. I think
> > we can live with this for now and move it into Kbuild later.
>
> Patch attached. Pleas
Hello Ben,
On Tuesday 17 Aug 2010 06:05:35 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Please add the check for DEBUG, and test that the result works. I think
> we can live with this for now and move it into Kbuild later.
Patch attached. Please review and commit.
Added the if condition to check for DEBUG. Built the
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 19:06 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
[...]
> So what has been finalized ?
>
> Like Kurt already mentioned, objcopy does need to read the file.
> I can put the conditional if DEBUG in the initial patch that I sent.
Please add the check for DEBUG, and test that the result wor
Hello Bastian et al,
On Saturday 14 Aug 2010 15:46:33 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 09:58:24AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 04:17:27AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > [I also wonder why we are copying the unstripped modules into
> > > /usr/lib/debug and
On Saturday 14 Aug 2010 02:46:43 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Why did you add a build-depends on binutils? It's build-essential.
>
Thanks for pointing this. Yes, we don't need to add binutils.
Ritesh
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signatu
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 09:58:24AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 04:17:27AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > [I also wonder why we are copying the unstripped modules into
> > /usr/lib/debug and not just debug info?
>
> Because the tools can't cope with them.
>
> >
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 09:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 04:17:27AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > [I also wonder why we are copying the unstripped modules into
> > /usr/lib/debug and not just debug info?
>
> Because the tools can't cope with them.
OK.
> >
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 04:17:27AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> [I also wonder why we are copying the unstripped modules into
> /usr/lib/debug and not just debug info?
Because the tools can't cope with them.
> And shouldn't this really be
> part of Kbuild
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 02:01 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> tags 49 +patch
> thanks
>
> Hello Bastian,
>
> On Tuesday 10 Aug 2010 13:35:58 Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > I tried re-building the kernel image with dh_strip -k but that did not
> > > help. So, how is the linux-image--dbg pack
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 02:01:02AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 7), cpio, module-init-tools, python, lzma
> [armel], libelf-dev, binutils-dev, asciidoc, xmlto
> +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 7), cpio, module-init-tools, python, lzma
> [armel], libelf-dev, binuti
tags 49 +patch
thanks
Hello Bastian,
On Tuesday 10 Aug 2010 13:35:58 Bastian Blank wrote:
> > I tried re-building the kernel image with dh_strip -k but that did not
> > help. So, how is the linux-image--dbg package created ?
>
> debian/rules.real shows it.
Thanks for pointing this out
Please quote correctly.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 01:27:20PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> I looked into dh_strip and it does seem to be doing the right thing.
The kernel build does not use dh_strip, as it does not build userspace
binaries.
> I tried re-building the kernel image with dh_strip
retitle 49 adding .gnu_debuglink section in kernel modules
thanks
Ben,
I looked into dh_strip and it does seem to be doing the right thing.
sub attach_debug {
my $file=shift;
my $debug_path=shift;
doit("objcopy", "--add-gnu-debuglink", $debug_path, $file);
}
attac
13 matches
Mail list logo
