On 2009-12-01 21:02, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
BTW, I was able to build SDP Toolkit 5.2.16v1.00, M-API 2.3.4
(10 Mar 2003) and then MODIS Cloud Mask (MOD35_L2) and
Atmospheric Profiles (MOD07_L2) on top of the hdf-eos4 and
hdf-eos5 packages modified as suggested. (Albei
BTW, I was able to build SDP Toolkit 5.2.16v1.00, M-API 2.3.4
(10 Mar 2003) and then MODIS Cloud Mask (MOD35_L2) and
Atmospheric Profiles (MOD07_L2) on top of the hdf-eos4 and
hdf-eos5 packages modified as suggested. (Albeit not without
some hacking all alon
> "IS" == Ivan Shmakov writes:
[...]
IS> BTW, I wasn't able to build i386 binaries: the # pbuilder build
IS> process has failed with:
> --cut--
> rm -f Swath_2.hdf Swathc_Test.hdf Swathf_Test.hdf testswathf.txt
> ./testswath_f90
> *** glibc detected ***
> /tmp/buildd/hdf-eos4-2.16v1
> "IS" == Ivan Shmakov writes:
[...]
IS> debian/rules reads:
> 10 DEB_CONFIGURE_SCRIPT_ENV += CFLAGS="-I/usr/include/hdf "
IS> Surely it shouldn't be
> 10 DEB_CONFIGURE_SCRIPT_ENV += CPPFLAGS="-Df2cFortran -I/usr/include/hdf"
IS> instead?
Or, rather:
10 DEB_CONFIG
So far, I was able to use the following interdiff to seemingly
make the package suit my needs. Please consider applying its
relevant portions to the Debian package.
--cut--
diff -u hdf-eos4-2.16v1.00.dfsg.1/debian/control
hdf-eos4-2.16v1.00.dfsg.1/debian/control
--- hdf-e
Source: hdf-eos4
Version: 2.16v1.00.dfsg.1-2
debian/rules reads:
10 DEB_CONFIGURE_SCRIPT_ENV += CFLAGS="-I/usr/include/hdf "
Surely it shouldn't be
10 DEB_CONFIGURE_SCRIPT_ENV += CPPFLAGS="-Df2cFortran -I/usr/include/hdf"
instead?
* Rationale
I don't
6 matches
Mail list logo
