Daniel, please use Jakub's patch. Mine fixed /usr/local issue, but I
forgot that dh_python doesn't move files to the right location, so files
ended in site-packages instead of dist-packages for python2.6. Sorry.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
found 555208 5.03-3
tags 555208 + patch
thanks
Unfortunately, fix for this bug was incorrect:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36929318/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.file_5.03-4_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
The attached patch really fixes this problem.
--
Jakub Wilk
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
-
Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> please install complete set of packages, including python,
> python-all{,-dev,-dbg}
> (i.e. `pyversions -rv` invoked in package dir should return "2.5 2.6")
i did. i take it that i did something other wrong then. however..
> Since your package doesn't ship .py files, you
[Daniel Baumann, 2009-11-10]
> Piotr Oz.arowski wrote:
> > Starting from Python 2.6, the installation paths for distutils have
> > changed. Instead of /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages, the default has
> > now changed to /usr/local.
>
> i've checked on a up2date sid with python2.6 from experimental
Piotr Oz.arowski wrote:
> Starting from Python 2.6, the installation paths for distutils have
> changed. Instead of /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages, the default has
> now changed to /usr/local.
i've checked on a up2date sid with python2.6 from experimental, and the
necessary files are installed i
Package: file
Version: 5.03-2
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python2.6 python-version
Hi,
Starting from Python 2.6, the installation paths for distutils have
changed. Instead of /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages, the default has
now changed to /usr/local.
pytho
6 matches
Mail list logo