Bug#553592: RFS: archivemail (was: Bug#553592: /usr/bin/archivemail: resurrect upstream and merge debian patches)

2011-03-28 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Uploaded. Thank you for your contribution to Debian ;) -- Every great idea is worthless without someone to do the work. --Neil Williams -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#553592: RFS: archivemail (was: Bug#553592: /usr/bin/archivemail: resurrect upstream and merge debian patches)

2011-03-26 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi Nikolaus, I'm glad to see you're still alive ;) On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 08:34:09PM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote: > On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:41:40AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > > If you feel like taking over the Debian side as well, I'll be happy to > > provide sponsorship. > > quite s

Bug#553592: RFS: archivemail (was: Bug#553592: /usr/bin/archivemail: resurrect upstream and merge debian patches)

2011-03-26 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:41:40AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > If you feel like taking over the Debian side as well, I'll be happy to > provide sponsorship. Hi Serafeim, quite some time has passed, but finally I've packaged archivemail 0.8.2. I would be happy if you could lend me some of y

Bug#553592: /usr/bin/archivemail: resurrect upstream and merge debian patches

2010-10-06 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 08:29:49PM +0200, Nikolaus Schulz wrote [edited]: > Hehe, the delay WRT packaging 0.8.0 already suggested that. And yes, > archivemail is not the most exciting piece of software. And congrats to > you for becoming a DD. :) Thanks. I've not uploaded 0.8 yet because of the

Bug#553592: /usr/bin/archivemail: resurrect upstream and merge debian patches

2010-10-03 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 02:41:40AM +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > > Meanwhile, I have released archivemail 0.8.1, and all Debian patches > > that were candidates for upstream have either gone into 0.8.0, or are > > obsolete. > > I've noticed, thanks for this! BTW I'm not terribly excited about

Bug#553592: /usr/bin/archivemail: resurrect upstream and merge debian patches

2010-10-02 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Nikolaus, On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:13:50AM +0200, Nikolaus Schulz wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 11:40:22AM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > > I'm opening this bug to keep track of the discussion with upstream > > maintainer > > Nikolaus S

Bug#553592: /usr/bin/archivemail: resurrect upstream and merge debian patches

2010-10-02 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
tags 553592 + fixed-upstream thanks On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 11:40:22AM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > I'm opening this bug to keep track of the discussion with upstream maintainer > Nikolaus Schulz, about resurrecting upstream and merging debian patches. Meanwhile, I have released archivemail

Bug#553592: /usr/bin/archivemail: resurrect upstream and merge debian patches

2009-11-01 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Package: archivemail Version: 0.7.2-7 Severity: wishlist File: /usr/bin/archivemail I'm opening this bug to keep track of the discussion with upstream maintainer Nikolaus Schulz, about resurrecting upstream and merging debian patches. -S -- debtags-organised WNPP bugs: http://members.hellug.gr