Just wanted to ping this bug in March 2011 and point out the patch still
works just fine...
Tony
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 04:31:48PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> > auth[success=1 default=ignore] pam_unix.so nullok_secure
> > authrequisite pam_deny.so
> >
> >You can guess what happens when someone blindly shoves pam_opie in
> >there.
>
> Nope, please explain
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:59:10PM -0400, you wrote:
I'm a wee bit tempted to raise this bug above wishlist, as the README
instructions are a little dangerous, in that they suggest wedging
pam_opie in between pam_unix and pam_deny. On a modern default Debian
setup, common-auth now looks like thi
Forgot to mention that this is also reported as LP #370218.
--
Joy: thanks, joy
elmo: that's redundant, elmo
doogie: go play in traffic
ah, the elmo we know and love
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
Package: libpam-opie
Version: 0.21-8+fbriere+1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Here's a patch that adds pam-auth-update support to libpam-opie. (I'm
CCing Steve Langasek so that he can tell me if I made a mistake. I'm
especially unsure about the Priority argument.)
I'm a wee bit tempted to rais
5 matches
Mail list logo
