On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 09:02:50PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I'm reluctant to upload because of it. But I can
> > if people feel strongly about it.
>
> The practical impact here is that until this bug is fixed, due to the
> archive lintian checks currently in place, this package can't be up
> I'm reluctant to upload because of it. But I can
> if people feel strongly about it.
The practical impact here is that until this bug is fixed, due to the
archive lintian checks currently in place, this package can't be uploaded -
including for security NMUs.
So I would suggest that you upload,
Hi Simon,
On Sunday 24 January 2010, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 07:42:47PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> > what about the suggested change? Is anything blocking this fix? :)
>
> The suggested change seems entirely reasonable to me.
> I'm reluctant to upload because of it. But I can
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 07:42:47PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Thursday 29 October 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > You may use mkfifo instead of mknod, since there is no policy
> > prohibition on mkfifo (and it can't be used to make special
> > files). Perhaps we can ad
Hi there,
On Thursday 29 October 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> You may use mkfifo instead of mknod, since there is no policy
> prohibition on mkfifo (and it can't be used to make special
> files). Perhaps we can add a footnote to policy mentioning mkfifo where
> the mknod prohibition
Seconded.
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 13:29 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava writes:
> > On Thu, Oct 29 2009, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> >> Could you suggest a policy-compliant method of creating fifos for the
> >> package? At the time that I added mknod to the maintainer script the
> >> con
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> On Thu, Oct 29 2009, Simon Horman wrote:
>> Could you suggest a policy-compliant method of creating fifos for the
>> package? At the time that I added mknod to the maintainer script the
>> consensus that this was the best option available.
> You may use mkfifo
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29 2009, Simon Horman wrote:
> Could you suggest a policy-compliant method of creating fifos for the
> package? At the time that I added mknod to the maintainer script
> the consensus that this was the best option available.
You may use mkfifo instead of mknod, since the
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 04:24:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Package: heartbeat
> Version: 2.1.4-7
> Severity: serious
> User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
> Usertags: mknod-in-maintainer-script
>
> Justification: Maintainer scripts must not create device files directly.
>
> Refer to Debian Po
Package: heartbeat
Version: 2.1.4-7
Severity: serious
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: mknod-in-maintainer-script
Justification: Maintainer scripts must not create device files directly.
Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 10.6 (Device files) for details.
manoj
-- System Inf
10 matches
Mail list logo
